It has been said that it doesn't matter whether you win or lose, but how you played the game.
There is, however, something truly special about doing really well and winning something you had always hoped for whether it be the job that you really wanted, an Olympic medal, or the
Worlds. For the latter of these, one of the Oxford A team is a friend from Vienna and while I don't share his passion for debating, I've occasionally followed his progress through other members of the debating community. It's exciting for me to see him succeed, an interesting feeling in itself, and I know that winning, while not vitally important, was his ultimate goal and to have achieved that is fantastic. Not all are able, or destined, to win but it is important to celebrate and congratulate those that do when they deserve to.
While thinking about this, I got interested in tall poppy syndrome.
Wikipedia has some fascinating things to say about this topic and so I thought I'd copy the most interesting bits below:
The term originates from accounts in
Aristotle's
Politics (Book 5, Chapter 10) and
Livy's
History of Rome, Book I. Aristotle wrote: "
Periander advised
Thrasybulus by cutting the tops of the tallest ears of corn, meaning that he must always put out of the way the citizens who overtop the rest." In Livy's account, the tyrannical
Roman King,
Tarquin the Proud, received a messenger from his son
Sextus Tarquinius asking what he should do next in
Gabii, since he had become all-powerful there. Rather than answering the messenger, Tarquinius went into his garden, took a stick, and symbolically swept it across his garden, thus cutting off the heads of the tallest poppies that were growing there. The messenger, tired of waiting for an answer, returned to Gabii and told Sextus what he had seen. Sextus realised that his father wished him to put to death all of the most eminent people of Gabii, which he then did.
A very early example of this syndrome is described in an incident from the life of Jesus. Returning to his home town after publicly teaching and miraculously healing others, he is confronted by local residents and the following occurs:
He came to his home town and taught the people in their synagogue. They were astonished and said, "Where did this man get such wisdom and mighty deeds? 55 Is he not the carpenter's son? Is not his mother named Mary and his brothers James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas? 56 Are not his sisters all with us? Where did this man get all this?" 57 And they took offense at him. But Jesus said to them, "A prophet is not without honor except in his native place and in his own house." 58 And he did not work many mighty deeds there because of their lack of faith. Matthew, Chapter 13:55-58[1]
This phenomenon is often interpreted as being based on and resulting from a resentment of others' success
[citation needed]. Those who subscribe, however, see themselves as attacking targets that take themselves too seriously or flaunt their success without due humility.
I'm not entirely sure what to say to finish this little rant off. Winning is always important to the winners, and if they deserve it (as opposed to say drug-enhanced performance at the Olympics), then winning is all that much sweeter. It's not everything, and should never be treated that way, but recognising the job well done by winners is as important as recognising the effort made by those who do not win.